In future epidemic outbreaks only the people of rich and powerful countries would have chances to survive?

in dpoll •  2 months ago  (edited)

In future epidemic outbreaks only the people of rich and powerful countries would have chances to survive?


Greetings Steemians!


Image source

Recent outbreak of Coronavirus in China had shaken the nerves of the top leaders of the world. It has a big impact on Chinese economy and also on world economy. However, China fought well against this menace. Chinese government built an 1000 bed hospital in just 10 days. China also pumped billions of dollars to boost its efforts. So, ultimately China will defeat this disease. I think it was not possible for any other third world country to complete such a herculean task.

It implies that it is necessary for any country to be powerful and wealthy in order to survive in outbreak of such an epidemic. What do you think?


  • Yes.

  • No.

  • Something else?

Answer the question at dpoll.xyz.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Voted for

  • Yes.

Voted for

  • Something else?

I do not see China as a third world country. They have worldwide help.
Leaders worldwide concerned? Who says the media?
If too many people stick together it's easy for a virus... We have all kind of flues, we had the Mexican flu and so much more. The only thing those leaders did was spreading hysteria, giving the wrong vaccine and waiting tax money by buying stuff one pharmacy advice to fill it's pockets.
I am sure China will beat this. I hope those 1000 beds are not all in the same room.

Voted for

  • Yes.

Voted for

  • Something else?

I think this is fake news to scare people and it is not working for the most part.

Voted for

  • Yes.

Voted for

  • Yes.

Voted for

  • No.

Voted for

  • Yes.

Voted for

  • Yes.

Voted for

  • Yes.

Voted for

  • Yes.

Voted for

  • No.

Voted for

  • Yes.

Voted for

  • Yes.

Voted for

  • Yes.

Voted for

  • Yes.