Retro Film Review: Animal House (1978)

in film •  4 months ago 

One of the things that differentiates the author of this review from most of the world's film critics is the opinion of John Landis. Many of Landis' films, often lauded by critics, were disappointments for me. That is especially the case in the latter part of his career, and it is hard to imagine why and how that author reached a cult status. But, earlier, while he was starting his career in 1970s, he used to make quite nice films. One of the most legendary ones is Animal House, 1978 comedy that was overshadowed by his greatest success - Blues Brothers, shot two years later.

This film actually doesn't have a lot of plot. It is set in fictional Faber college in 1962 and chronicles the struggle between two student fraternities - Omegas, nice, by-the-book, rich, arrogant and powerful students; and Deltas, nonconformist losers who, instead of studying, spend all their time on alcohol, drugs, sex and different kinds of orgies. Their activity become the thorn in the side of the college administration who decide to kick them all out. But the brave Deltas would refuse to give up without a fight, which would culminate in the apocalyptic parade in the end.

Some may think that Animal House represents sorts of autobiography for its writer Chris Miller, who based the plot on his own experiences as Darthmouth College student in 1962. Others may argue that Landis in this film, by portraying the rivalry between Omegas and Deltas, gives his own commentary about the great struggle between the forces of Old and New in 1960s America. But the real motive for Animal House was most likely nothing more than an excuse for entire series of jokes, many of them so tasteless that they were really challenging the standards of its, rather liberal, times. Yes, some of these jokes are rather tasteless, many of them including Bluto (brilliantly played by late John Belushi) and his repetitive use of bodily fluids becomes boring after a while. Some other jokes aren't so funny either. But guess what? Film as a whole works as an excellent guilty pleasure. It made without any redeeming values nor high artistic standards, but it makes other, more noble and ambitious works, to pale in comparison simply by entertaining viewers. Most of the jokes are funny characters are well- played by excellent actors (Donald Sutherland, John Vernon and young Kevin Bacon among others), and the soundtrack is very good. The only real reason to bash *Animal House? is the fact that it spawned entire sub-genre of its imitations in the decade to come – movies with the words "soft", "hard" and "body" in title, all of them sharing this film’s low standards, but not the talent of its creators. But we shouldn't be too harsh towards Animal House - today, same as two decades ago, it serves its purpose by making us laugh.

RATING: 7/10 (+++)

(Note: The text in its original form was posted in Usenet newsgroup rec.arts.movies.reviews on June 10th 1999)

==

Blog in Croatian https://draxblog.com
Blog in English https://draxreview.wordpress.com/
Cent profile https://beta.cent.co/@drax
Minds profile https://www.minds.com/drax_rp_nc

Brave browser: https://brave.com/dra011

BTC donations: 1EWxiMiP6iiG9rger3NuUSd6HByaxQWafG
ETH donations: 0xB305F144323b99e6f8b1d66f5D7DE78B498C32A7

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Congratulations @drax! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You distributed more than 5000 upvotes. Your next target is to reach 6000 upvotes.

You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!

Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!

Hello. Currently there are a lot of curation groups and whales curating amazing content, there's no need to buy votes. The downvote you received is to discourage the buying of votes from bidbots. We kindly invite you to join us on the #NewSteem attitude, where good content receives votes and the organic content get the most attention. Buying votes hurts you, other authors and the Steem Ecosystem in general, please don't do it.

In this case, you bought a vote by sending sports token to @sportsvoter, which is exactly the same as buying votes with Steem. It hurts the Steem ecosystem. Please don't buy votes.